Paper # 1

English 110

Detorie Spring 2009

Assignment # 1

Paper Schedule:

2/4: Paper Assigned

2/9: Typed Thesis and Plan due for Peer Review (bring 2 copies)

2/11: Draft due for Peer Review (bring 2 copies)

2/18: Final Draft due at the beginning of class

Your purpose in this paper is to state and explain an idea based on a topic given below. You should first explore the topic, using some of the methods discussed in your Penguin Handbook. Your exploration should lead to a working thesis and a tentative plan for developing the thesis. Bring two typed copies of your thesis and plan to class on 2/9. After we review these plans in class, you will write a first draft. Bring two typed copies of your first draft to class on 2/11. The final draft, revised in light of the advice you get from your peers and your own careful review, is due on 2/18.

What I’m looking for:

Length 900-1200 words (3-5 pages)

Independent intellectual effort and thoughtfulness

A clear and wel1-focused thesis that is specific and interesting

A clear scheme of organization: introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion

Unified paragraphs with topic sentences and strong transitions between paragraphs

Backing up your ideas with examples from the text

Quotes that are integrated in way that demonstrates close, thoughtful reading

Skillfully constructed sentences

Evidence of reflection and revision

Choose one of the following topics:

1. How would Lao-Tzu critique the society in which you live? What would he recommend to you as worthwhile behavior and what would he condemn? Base your answers on an analysis of the advice Lao-Tzu gives in the Tao- te Ching. Would you find it possible to argue against his critique and maintain a worthwhile and virtuous path for yourself?

2. What form of government would Machiavelli feel is most stable and desirable? Base your answers on an analysis of the recommendations Machiavelli gives his prince. Consider his views of individuals in society and their roles and responsibilities in regard to the prince. What governments of today might satisfy Machiavelli’s demands for the way a state should operate?

3. Compare Lao-Tzu’s view of human nature with Machiavelli’s. Consider how this view shapes the ultimate purpose of government, the obligation of the leader to the people being led, and what seems to be the main work of the state. Which view do you favor? Why?

4. Compare the advice of Machiavelli or Lao-Tzu with the behavior/politics of a leader – past, present, or fictional – who you think exhibits the qualities described by Lao-Tzu or Machiavelli (pick one). Be sure to back up your argument with examples from both the text and the behavior/policies of the leader you describe. (Note: by “fictional” I mean a character from a story, not a leader who you have invented for the purpose of this essay).

GOOD LUCK!